anti carry
RTZ doesnt get farm priority and is often left alone in lane while zai/crit rotate mid
thats why they give him utility cores or strong laners. razor to screw over enemy core, venom for teamfight, lifestealer for sieging/independent laning etc.
you rarely see him
play sven or am
even if he gets harassed a lot he suddenly is top of networth chart, its kind of his quality as a player.
I remember one game where he played lifestealer against a weaver which obv harrassed him hard, didnt get any rotations at all but still got top networth.
probably the core player with the most efficient farming and map awareness
RTZ was more of a pos 2 even tho he took safe lane, there isn't much babysit for him, leaving him 1v1 against offlaner half of the time. You will notice they leave him alone even more when he plays Veno, he was almost pos 3.
Mid is like the new safelane since they added another melee creep, so zoning mid became more rewarding
At least that's what I guess.
No it's not good.
As said before just bc rtz in the safelane that does not mean he is pos 1.
I thought they released an article earlier talking about how Razor is an anti-carry and great at seiging - hence the recent razor picks in general.
finally a hero i played in my first days of dota is good (im going to overlook the 6.82 memepush with lycan razor dp etc)
@know no better
Understand what the question asked before you even think of speaking.
Pos 1 razor has never been a thing, and will not be a thing if you have watched any pro game. Never did I say razor was a bad hero, but he is a bad pos 1.
High mmr players have also said he is not a good pos 1 plenty of times.
Get off the forum if you cannot read.
Then why EG still doing it while its not really that effective, look at Epicenter Moscow they could have tied the score 2 - 2 against liquid on the grand finals but no they decided to do this instead.
Моля, впишете се, за да публикувате коментар.
Topic is it good? why RTZ likes doing it?